Seems like the television networks got a very very nice present;

THE $250 million handout from the Rudd government to Australia’s television oligarchy will flow almost directly to the profits of the networks’ owners because there are no conditions that it be used for local content.

Unconditional and all. What do people think of their taxes being used to fund Rudd’s popularity with the media?

Guess it all starts to fit.

Evidence of global warming keeps accumulating, How to blame humans for anything, Global warming and fat trees

What do the Turbulls & Rudds have most in common?

MONEY

Malcolm Turnbull’s estimated wealth in 2009 was $178 million. The Rudd household ‘more than $60 million‘.

Both families have very powerful realms of influence;

The Prime Minister’s wife, Therese Rein, has lured well-known director David Gonski, who runs the Australian Securities Exchange, to chair her company Ingeus, according to The Australian newspaper. The Rein foundation has on the board Phillip Toyne one of the countries best known environmentalists.

So why are these two obscenely rich men so keen on an ETS that will make the rest of us poorer?

In Norway its not just the cars that are getting buried but the boats as well with many of them sinking. More here

In the USA Washibgtoh has been shut down by a snowstorm with New York preparing to get hit!

Snowmaggedon – America battling the cold war. NOAA caught out in deception again,

UN taking control of the media, governance and the funds.

The UN PRI (Principles for responsible investing) which directs superannuation/retirement funds into UN backed causes already has hit $80 trillion and growing. This means peoples retirement savings are going to be wasted on risky, expensive green projects like wind power that only float because of government subsidies and that quite likely will have no returns. Obviously the UN gets a cut of course if not directs the funds to where it has vested interests, but the investors/retirees are likely to end up broke. And don’t forget the UN PRI Academic Network.

The UN FCC (Framework Convention on Climate Change) would have started with the West paying an annual climate debt to the third world of 0.7% of their GDP with the UN putting the figure between $25 & $45 trillion dollars. African dictators however have a draft text demanding 5% of the GDP of western nations. This if adopted by in future by the undemocratic UN could push the climate debt it insists the world to pay to hundreds of trillions of dollars.

The UN support from world banks and the World bank. Like the UN the World bank requires sovereign immunity. UN has funding of about $30 billion per year which it thinks is small as a world government. America in 2009 got all its debts to UN up to date.

The UNDP (United Nations Development Program) includes the  UN REDD program (control of world forests), .

The UN Global Compact seeks to provide regulatory control for businesses around the world which again directs business to follow UN agendas and principles.

In effect this NGO has already formed a world government all that remains is for it to remove our democratic powers.

Dont forget the UN peacekeeping force. UN WHO now wanting to tax us for everything as well. Guess if they take all of our money through taxes so we are almost bankrupt then they can lend it back to us and then they own us – a simply transfer of wealth. What are our governments doing to stop this – NOTHING!

UN redirecting the funds to its sources;

Opulance. Lavish climate conferences in Kyoto, Bali, Copenhagen, Mexico where there is no shortage of limousines, private jets, caviar and 5 star accommodation for delegates meeting to work out how to reduce the standards of living for the rest of us.  Likewise the salaries, business dealings and conflicts of interest of the UN. The UN proletariat certainly know how to look after themselves.

Green Bureaucracy; The UN is nothing more than a world government in waiting. As its funds grow then so does its workforce and need for more funds.

Climate alarmism. Based on a religious model – we humans have sinned aganst the earth and must pay for our sins to GAIA the UN.

Socialist intentions. The UN, Clud of Rome etc makes no secret of its malthusian and socialist intentions. Copenhagen agreement was meant to bring in their governance!

UN costs 60% of relief effort,

The size and influence of the UN has far exceeded what could reasonably be called safe and in the best interests of humanity.

There is way too much power in too few hands. The more power is centralised the more we will suffer.

The high cost of climate alarmism,      Norway – home of the hypocritical,     Favored funding – if your an alarmist,

The $4 trillion euro IIGCC,     IIGCC chairman /BBC head of pensions investment Peter Dunscombe,     UN global plan for taxation UN’s climate of cash

Every politician voting on the ETS has a legal and moral responsibility to be impartial and declare any conflicts of interest insofar as whether voting for the ETS will cause them to benefit financially or otherwise in ANY way.

It has come to light that a large amount of investment, superannuation and other funds have heavily invested in ‘green’ businesses. Senators need to perform due diligence to ensure they do not benefit directly or indirectly from any holdings they or their funds have and be completely transparent to the Parliament and the Australian public.

This transparency would include declaring any shares or investments held directly or indirectly by them that could improve in value as a result of supporting the ETS and that could bring into question the required need for them to be impartial.

Conflicts of interest and corrupted science, BBC ecobias, Climatechange secretary’s girlfriend conflict of interest, Another correction the IPCC needs to make!, Australian climate poll, Monckton vs Lambert, Whats happened to global warming? Labor hypocrisy, 20th century warming – NOT,

But in another way quite realistic and scary!

see more here, here, here, here, here and  here

But then its not that far off the mark;

House audits coming!, IPCC propaganda – not science, IPCC lies,

The destruction of NASA

This morning I read an article over at The Indapendant Independent that made all sorts of claims about climate skeptics with a picture of Steve McIntyre adjoining (climate audit response here, more comment by Bishop Hill here) – even though Steve McIntyre wasn’t mentioned in the article. The article made all sorts of claims but gave no actual proof. So I commented on the article as follows;

“SO wheres the proof that climate skeptics are linked to big oil? The article above makes assertions that are inconclusive – theres only claims – no links. I run a skeptics blog and to date I havnt received a cent. I do it because I got sick of hear global warming lies. Sort of shoots your theory to bits doesnt it.”

Needless to say my post got deleted My mistake it is still there, but I did receive an email response from juliaandbsmith and then found their post/response still there. as follows;

Subject: Re: Big oil think tanks
Well if you actually read my piece, there is no reference to my views on Climate Change, just a call for all to support democracy, examine actual reality, and set our best minds to work on our common problems. Nothing a reasonable person could possibly object to!

You don’t promote your cause at all well by posting knee-jerk, badly spelt, aggressive posts, even worse, I can’t believe that haven’t even read the previous post, just assumed a position that isn’t even there!!

I’m beginning to make my mind up, in technical matters I’m going to respect the views of people who actually seem to have an education. Perhaps a “blogs” and “posts” filter could be invented to filter out anything with poor spelling, certainly the quality of exchange would be improved, if not the content!

Since when has it been wrong to ask for proof when claims are made. That I would think was a reasonable request. However what I objected to and others found appalling was guilt by insinuation, and as Bishop Hill says – gutter journalism. All these journalists do by their article and response is expose their own ineptitude, their own bias and their own inability to present a reasonable argument. I have emailed them a link to this post – they are free to respond – I’m not interested in censoring them – but what I, like others would like to see is the facts that support their argument – how are we climate skeptics paid by big oil?

Over at Bishop Hill they are discussing whether an error has been found in the land temperature index CRUTEM3. This is the program that is meant to adjust the raw (real) data to make it more real.

These errors would be on top of errors already having been found in the appalling quality of temperature recording stations (see surfacestations), the drastically reducing quantity of temperature recording stations, the biased warming adjustment of station data, the faulty exclusion of the urban heat island bias and more.

Real program accuracy, Todays IPCC blooper, Big oil – not what they claimed,

What most people dont realise is that the temperature record released to the media is not the raw recorded data but the adjusted data. And it is on the adjusted data that all the gloom and doom, chicken little, sky is falling, end of the world, and obscene money making prophesies are based upon!

If however you go to the raw data, in rural areas where there has been no increased in urbanisation what do you typically find in the temperature record? A slight cooling trend that has deepened this century. This would be consistent with sun inactivity and natural historical climatic trends.

WWF polar bear lies, WWF climate lies, WWF forest lies, WWF grant money, Britain to freeze again in record cold

Why are we NOT surprised. BBC climate alarmism bias is simply because they had invested very heavily in climate alarmist industries! Talk about conflicts of interest! More here and here

Wave power “research” picked from commercial website.

Now a sheepish IPCC has had to admit there was no scientific basis for claims that global warming was linked to a supposed rise in natural disasters like hurricanes and floods.

Omitted; the bright side of global warming

Dont dismiss Climategate,   Don’t trust the weatherman’s forecasts,   Scientists behaving badly, Ban free speech,    Western civilisation is NOT in decline,

CLIMATE MAKES MONEY

Looks like the churches are in on the scam also. So the only thing propping up global warming is not the ’science’ but the vested interests who have put all our life savings into it!

The government has announced that all homes will have to get an energy audit – costing up to $1500 each before they will be able to sell. The house will then have to comply with the audit potentially costing an additional tens of thousands of dollars or more. If the cost of compliance exceeds the cost of your dwelling then it is likely its value of your dwelling could become nothing! and it could be cheaper just to demolish it (so much for recycling).

More here. The UK doing the same. America following suit as well.

These costs are in addition to other property related costs going through the roof! Water costs have skyrocketed unnecessarily. Power costs have skyrocketed unnecessarily. Council’s impose Eco costs.

Cost of new homes have also skyrocketed because of BASIX (energy) compliance because of solar, rainwater, fluorescent lighting, double glazing, insulation, awning/screening and other requirements.

As wages arnt following the same upward trajectory as green compliance guess other areas of peoples personal budgets will need to be savaged.

What we are seeing is the continual erosion of freedom. Our government no longer listens to the people but to the UN IPCC. We no longer have government by the people or for the people bu government under the direction of UN global governance. The surrender has begun!

Monckton tour sellout, New green bureaucracy already operating, Science has rarely ever been about facts,

UNIPCC Alaskan glacier melt overestimated, FOI request reality, Malicious minds of alarmist smears, Perpetrator casting a victims shadow, Journalistic stupidity, Peer review and transparency, Wilderness society in turmoil, Copenhagen failure adds to Rudd’s failures, Penn State whitewash

Climategate follow the money trail – help needed!

Alan Caruba UN despotism by any name!

Change the light bulb