T W A W K I

The world as we know it

May 2, 2012 • 14:55 3

The Government’s ongoing violation of citizens rights

The most sacred duty of governments is to represent the will of the people. Our governments are meant to listen to us, represent us and bring to completion what we give them taxes to complete. What happens when we have governments who do none of the above, who desperately cling to power for powers sake, who are more interested in their comfy positions, draining the public purse for their own good and pursuing their own elitist ideals? They should be thrown out.

Such is the appalling corruption exhibited by Gillard’s ALP who will do everything in it’s power to do what it wants and work as hard as possible to silence the people. The carbon tax is a huge example of their self interested, self serving agenda, brought in through lies and subterfuge and being implemented against the express will of the people.

As recently noted my complaint against the government for it’s corrupt and fraudulent implementation of the carbon tax. Where Australians were given a single week to digest, process and formulate a response to 11,000 pages of documentation. There wasn’t enough time to simply read it let along digest it. Of those that responded the vast majority had their responses reclassified as correspondence and so disregarded. Democratic process was totally and utterly abandoned. I complained to the government (transcript at the end of the post), then came the governments appalling response here (in summary they claim they make the rules so they can do what they want).

Here is my response today;

Andrew

I have read the governments letter which basically says it makes the rules and therefore I have no rights. I did respond to the governments committee but was unable to do so reasonably or fairly because of the governments 1 week time constraints which are an unreasonable restriction. My response like thousands of others who disagreed with the government were ‘re-classified’ as correspondence and not a submission – another abuse of my/peoples rights. Human rights seem to be the last thing that this government takes into account – it is meant to be representing us not doing it’s hardest to walk all over us and create scenarios where it can ignore us.
 
For the government to then go on and say it is immune from impeachment and questioning further shows its disregard for human rights. Article 2(a) ICCPR requires the government to provide a remedy to the situation, which the Government have not done. To claim the abuse of rights is OK because of their timetable and their power is neither satisfactory as the timetable should be set by respecting the peoples rights and not vice versa and their power should be there to empower the people and not disempower them as they are doing. 
 
I would like to see my complaint proceed as the governments response is totally unsatisfactory. To confirm they have denied me my rights but think it is ok to do so and not offer a viable solution is a failing of governance and a clear violation of our constitution and the ICCPR. The Government are meant to govern (for the people), not rule (for themselves) and there is a huge difference.
 
Regards
Doug

International Covenant on Civil & Political Rights

My original complaint is as follows;

PART 1 – COMPLAINANT:  Doug McIntyre
____________________________________________

Complainant’s Address:  xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
____________________________________________

Complainant’s Suburb:  xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
____________________________________________

Complainant’s Postcode:  xxxx
____________________________________________

Complainant’s State:  NSW
____________________________________________

Complainant’s Telephone:  xxxxxxxxx
____________________________________________

Complainant’s Email Address:  xxxxxxxxxxxx
____________________________________________

EMAIL COPY TO COMPLAINANT?:  YES
____________________________________________

ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION::  YES
____________________________________________

Reason for Electronic Communication?:  Convenience
____________________________________________

COMPLAINT ON BEHALF OF SOMEONE ELSE?:  NO
____________________________________________

SOLICITOR/ ADVOCATE?:  NO
____________________________________________

PART 2 – RESPONDENT’S NAME:  Australian Labor Party
____________________________________________

Respondent’s Address:  Postal Address:
PO Box 6222
KINGSTON ACT 2604
____________________________________________

Respondent’s Telephone:  6120 0800
____________________________________________

RELATIONSHIP TO RESPONDENT?:  Government
____________________________________________

PART 3 – REASON FOR COMPLAINT:  My human rights have been breached by a federal government agency
____________________________________________

DATE OF EVENTS BEING COMPLAINED ABOUT:  14th September 2011 – 22nd September 2011
____________________________________________

DESCRIPTION Description of the event?:  The Australian Labor Party announced and released an inquiry into Australia’s Clean Energy Future on the 14th September 2011.
As part of that inquiry over 1100 pages of documents (including 14 bills) have been released. The government has given me, an Australian citizen the grossly inadequate time of 7 days to respond to those documents.
As this is one of the most far reaching set of bills in Australia’s history I would like a fair and reasonable amount of time to  read, assess and articulate my response to the inquiry in a manner that could allow an adequate amount of time to perform due diligence on the documents. The insufficient time of 7 days to respond to the inquiry is a failure of procedural fairness and a failure of natural justice to me by the government in that it is grossly inadequate. The insufficient 7 day time frame is also a failure of due process and a failure of the government’s duty of care to me as a citizen, harming my right to free speech.
The inquiry also fails according to ALRC Report 111 Making Enquiries – A new statutory framework, 6.52 An enquiries terms of reference states “The drafting of the terms of reference for an inquiry, however, is fundamental to its success”,yet there are no explicit or documented terms of reference meaning my application could be ruled invalid by the Government simply due to wrong assumptions on my part.
The Australian Human Rights Commission has documented on it’s website the human rights standards and international treaties that Australia has agreed to uphold. Some of these are as follows; with the pertinent clauses listed where I believe my rights as an individual have also been breached.
Article 19. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights

* Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. My freedom of opinion and expression is severely interfered with by having insufficient time to seek (read), and impart (assess and articulate) my response to the government.

Article 25. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

Every citizen shall have the right and the opportunity, without any of the distinctions mentioned in article 2 and without unreasonable restrictions:

(a) To take part in the conduct of public affairs, directly or through freely chosen representatives;

The Labor Government has posed unreasonable restrictions on my rights and opportunities to respond to it’s legislation in that I am given an insufficient 7 days to read, assess and comment on over 1100 pages of documentation. As such my ability to take my part in the conduct of public affairs is personally restricted.

Article 1 International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

1. All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.

The Labor Government has denied my right of self determination by restricting my ability to respond to their inquiry through a 7 day response period. My right to freely determine my political status, economic, social and cultural development is therefore severely hindered.

____________________________________________

PART 4 – LOSS OR HARM EXPERIENCED?:  As a stakeholder in the future of Australia I feel totally disempowered. I am depressed that democracy is hindered with the actions of the Australian Labor Party. I feel hopeless
____________________________________________

PART 5 – DESIRED OUTCOMES/ RESOLUTION?:  I would like a fair and reasonable time to read, assess and articulate my response to the Joint Select Committee on Australia’s Clean Energy Future Legislation. With 18 bills and around 1100 pages of documentation at an absolute minimum I would require 4 weeks to read thoroughly, 4 weeks to assess the legislation and 4 weeks to articulate my response. A 12 week time frame would be fair and reasonable time frame and is a typical time frame for many enquiries that the government undertakes.
____________________________________________

PART 6 – COMPLAINTS TO OTHER AGENCIES?:  NO
____________________________________________

FORM SUBMITTED BY USER:   SUBMIT YOUR COMPLAINT
____________________________________________

Filed under: Governance

April 30, 2012 • 13:36 2

Windfarms increase temps 10 x fold

So let’s get this right – windfarms are put in to help reduce global temps by reducing our need for coal fired power stations. Yet the theory doesnt match the reality – just as many coal fired power stations are required to ensure we have power when the wind isnt blowing. So wind farm fail already. But now their monolithic steel and concrete structures up to 40 stories tall are shown to increase temperatures bu 10 x fold in rural areas.

Wind farms linked to rising temperatures: Scientists concerned about impact on wildlife and weather

Bit like the biofuel menace that raised the price of food, took valuable land out of food production and pushed another 100 million into poverty.

Every brainless green scheme seems to end in disaster for the green socialists.

Filed under: Governance,

April 27, 2012 • 13:11 0

Destroying the ANZAC liberties

Guest post by Graham Williamson. You can read more of Graham’s research here

As we celebrate the hard won freedoms we enjoy on Anzac day, please pay attention to moves outlined below to remove those freedoms under the guise of concern for climate change. Though hard to believe, Australian lawyers and politicians are currently, as we celebrate Anzac day, looking for ways to ensure Australia can be forced to surrender control and massive amounts of money to the UN and poorer countries using climate change as an excuse. These will be enforced changes, NOT democratic changes.

Enjoy Anzac day and remember. Enjoy your freedoms and protect them.

Graham Williamson

 

Explaining the debt and why we owe climate compensation

http://uk.oneworld.net/guides/climatechange

“The concept of climate justice seeks to restore equity in two ways. Firstly, that richer countries should repay their climate debt by undertaking severe cuts in emissions, reserving “atmospheric space” for the growing emissions of poorer countries. Secondly, that they should provide financial support for low carbon transition and adaptation to the damaging effects of climate change.

These principles of climate justice are firmly enshrined in the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). This treaty was agreed at the Rio de Janeiro “Earth Summit” in 1992 with the ultimate objective of “stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere.” (NOTE: The UNFCC was enforced in Australia under Part 1 Section 3a of the Clean Energy Act)

The Convention demands application of the precautionary principle and that the scale of emission reductions should be assessed “in the light of the best available scientific information.” And international climate change laws must observe the Convention’s commitment to “common but differentiated responsibilities” between richer and poorer countries………….Desperately slow implementation of the UNFCCC vision has driven climate justice campaigners to refer increasingly to human rights law and to the legal principle of reparations for damages.”

 

In 2010…..
http://www.guardian.co.uk/global-development/poverty-matters/2010/nov/12/dhaka-climate-court-criminals
“Imagine an international court (17, 18 ) where the poorest people in the world could sue countries such as the US or Britain for failing to keep to agreements to reduce climate emissions or for knowingly causing devastatingclimate change. It’s some way off, but this week has seen an extraordinary tribunal being held in Dhaka, the capital of Bangladesh, with more than 1,200 people including British lawyers, politicians and economists, listening to the testimonies of villagers living at the frontline of climate change.”

 

In 2011 Durban UN conference promotes International Climate Court
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/12/10/un-floats-global-climate-court-to-enforce-emissions-rules/
“U.N. Floats Global ‘Climate Court’ to Enforce Emissions Rules
United Nations climate envoys have proposed the creation of a global “climate court” that would be responsible for enforcing a sprawling set of rules requiring developed countries to cut emissions while compensating poorer countries in order to pay off a “historical climate debt.”……….. The proposal is meant to “guarantee the compliance of Annex I Parties with all the provisions of this decision.” Annex I countries are mostly developed countries, covering the United States, Britain, Australia, Canada and much of Europe — including countries that are struggling financially such as Greece and Portugal. The rules of the road the court would presumably enforce are based on the view that these developed countries owe developing countries a “debt” over climate change, and must provide financial aid in addition to taking major steps toward cutting emissions.  In one section, the document calls for developed countries to help poorer countries with “finance, technology and capacity building” so they can “adapt to and mitigate climate change” while helping eliminate poverty. Another section provides that developing countries should receive an amount of money equal to the amount “developed countries spend on defense, security and warfare.” Yet the document also calls for a guaranteed end to warfare altogether — for the sake of curbing climate change. One section, noting that “conflict-related activities emit significant greenhouse gas emissions,” calls on all parties to “cease destructive activities” like warfare — and then channel the money that would have been spent on war and other defense projects toward “a common enemy: climate change.” The document also asserts the “rights of mother earth,” a concept that environmental activists have been pushing for.”

But according to Gunter (1), the Kyoto Protocol, which the Gillard government legislated to enforce in Australia through Part 1, Section 3a of the Clean Energy Act, is a sham when it comes to controlling climate (1):

“Kyoto is now mostly about punishing rich countries for being rich and forcing them to pay vast sums — up to $1.6-trillion a year — to the UN for redistribution to poorer nations (after, of course, the UN has taken a healthy cut off the top to support its own wasteful bureaucracy, nepotism, cronyism, incompetence and corruption)…….. Whereas the original Kyoto Protocol laid out how much each developed country was to reduce its carbon emissions — Canada agreed to reduce its CO2 emissions to 6% below 1990s levels — the Durban agreement (which is effectively an amendment to Kyoto) concentrates mostly on blaming the developed world for climate change and dictating how much guilt money it should pay. The implication is that somehow all this money — at least $100-billion a year, rising to as much as $1.6-trillion — will buy an end to global warming.”

Australian government supports Durban moves to force Australians to pay their climate debt
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/durban-fine-print-shows-we-will-lose-our-autonomy/story-fn558imw-1226221278321
“CLIMATE Change Minister Greg Combet fully supports the decisions made at the Durban climate talks. These include binding Australia to take action. We are going to commit ourselves to an offshore body that can make binding decisions on our economy. We are gradually losing the ability to govern ourselves and to retain control of our destiny. A new international climate court will have the power to compel Western nations to pay ever-larger sums to Third World countries in the name of making reparation for supposed climate debt.”

The Australian government even described the Durban outcome as a (2) “remarkable step forward”, a (3, 4, 5) “significant breakthrough”, and (6) “a massively historic step.”

But what do the lawyers say?

British environmental lawyer Polly Higgins has long supported an International Climate Court (17, 18, 19).

AUSTRALIAN LEGAL EXPERTS PREPARE FOR CLIMATE COURT CASES

In Australia, the Australian Climate Justice Program and environmental and animal rights lawyer Keely Boom (20, 21, 22, 23, 24) are at the forefront of proceedings (25). In a recent article entitled “See you in court: the rising tide of international climate litigation”  Keely explains (25):

“The Pacific Island State of Palau recently announced it will seek an Advisory Opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ), asking whether countries have a responsibility to avoid their emissions causing climate change damage elsewhere. This will be the world’s first international climate change case and it has been a long time coming………Palau’s announcement reveals that it intends to ask the ICJ to provide guidance on how the “no harm rule” (more on this below) and the United Nations’ Law of the Sea Convention (LOSC) apply to climate change damage………Climate change is not the result of a deliberate act to cause damage, but rather the cumulative effect of routine social and economic activities such as burning coal, driving cars and grazing livestock. None of these acts are crimes at either national or international law. So how could Palau have a claim?

Breaching the golden (environmental) rule

The “no harm rule” is a rule of customary international law that declares a State has a duty to prevent, reduce and control the risk of environmental harm to other States……..It is not necessary to show actual harm in order to demonstrate a breach of this rule. An increase in risk of harm is sufficient although the increase needs to be significant. Thus, the no harm rule is particularly well suited to the problem of climate change damage.

It could be argued that Australia has breached the “no harm rule” on the basis that:

1) Australia has had an opportunity to reduce greenhouse gas emissions

2) climate change damage was foreseeable, at least since 1992 when Australia signed the United NationsFramework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)

3) Australia has not taken proportionate measures to mitigate its emissions.”

“From the air to the sea

On another front, article 194(2) of the LOSC declares that States are obliged to take all measures necessary to ensure activities under their jurisdiction or control do not cause “damage by pollution” to the marine environment of other States.

The LOSC contains a wide definition of pollution, and greenhouse gases from human sources could fit within it.

Australia may also be breaching the LOSC through failing to cut emissions and failing to prevent pollution to the marine environment. But the LOSC lacks specificity, potentially providing Australia with enough wiggle room to evade responsibility.

The causation hurdle

The 2007 Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) found “warming of the climate system is unequivocal” and most of the observed warming since the mid 20th century is due to human activity.

But can one State’s emissions be linked to another’s climate change damage? The “but-for test” asks “but for the defendant’s act, would the harm have occurred?” Admittedly, this test is poorly suited to climate change, where the process is cumulative.

The but for test would require proof that without the defendant State’s emissions, the damage would not have occurred. But no one State is responsible for climate change and climate change science is fraught with uncertainties. That said, the fact multiple States have contributed to climate change does not necessarily limit application of international law to the problem.

The Nuclear Tests Cases concerned alleged damage caused to Australia and New Zealand by France’s testing of nuclear weapons in the Pacific. In this case, Australia argued that any additional exposure to radioactive contamination, no matter how small, substantially contributed to the risk of radiation-related injuries.

The ICJ did not decide on this point in the Nuclear Tests Case, yet Australia’s argument is clearly relevant to Palau’s predicament. Therefore, the appropriate test may be whether a State’s contribution has caused additional exposure to climate change damage.

Turning the tide

An Advisory Opinion from the ICJ may help Pacific Island States such as Palau turn the tide in the international climate negotiations. Arguably, a credible case can be made. A ruling by the ICJ could help provide a new impetus for Australia and the world community to find an international solution to climate change.”

And in 2012 Bob Carr announces his desire to give evidence against Australia in the International Court to assist Palau (7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12)

Foreign Minister Bob Carr assured the UN of Australia’s support for (7) “international legal action on climate change” to support a UN “resolution seeking an opinion from the International Court of Justice that would mean nations had to take action on climate change under existing treaties.”

http://andrewmcintyre.org/2012/04/13/carr-wants-to-give-evidence-against-australia/
“This is either self-destructive madness or cynical tokenism to buy into the UN Security Council. Not content with attempting to undermine Australia with the introduction of a carbon tax — a deeply unpopular policy — the Gillard government is wanting us to be hauled before the International Court of Justice to shame her own country. This is quite insane and irresponsible and clearly not in Australia’s national interest. It shows the Prime Minister is prepared to betray Australia for her own policy goals.  FOREIGN Minister Bob Carr has volunteeredAustralia to give evidence on behalf of poor nations that want the United Nations to investigate if big emitters – potentially including Australia – have a legal responsibility to keep their greenhouse gases from hurting other countries. Australia would give evidence supporting a push led by Palau for a UN resolution asking the International Court of Justice to assess how much countries were responsible for the damage their emissions did overseas.”

And more………

http://m.smh.com.au/opinion/political-news/carr-to-help-fight-emitters-australia-among-them-20120413-1wz13.html
FOREIGN Minister Bob Carr has volunteered Australia to give evidence on behalf of poor nations that want the United Nations to investigate if big emitters – potentially including Australia – have a legal responsibility to keep their greenhouse gases from hurting other countries. In an interview with The Saturday Age in New York, Mr Carr said he had told UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon Australia would give evidence supporting a push led by Palau for a UN resolution asking the International Court of Justice to assess how much countries were responsible for the damage their emissions did overseas. Climate law experts said that if the resolution was successful, it could be the first step by worst-affected nations in seeking reparations from countries such as the US, China and Australia.”

But the Australian government, BOM, and CSIRO have been compiling ‘evidence’ and issuing grave predictions about climate change in Palau (13, 14), though how much of this is alleged to be caused by humans and reversible by humans is not clear (13, 14). So Australian tax payers are funding research into scaring the Palauian government about the consequences of (human caused???) climate change and now Bob Carr will assist them to obtain compensation from all Australians?

But how much money do we owe?

According to Gideon Polya (15, 16) Australia owes a climate debt to poorer countries and the “Net Per Capita Climate Debt (US$ per person)” of Australia is “$23,900 or $24,265, if including the effect of its huge GHG Exports on its Climate Credits” while the “Net Climate Debt” for Australia is $0.5 trillion. Polya concludes (16): it is apparent that the greedy climate criminals (notably the US, Australia and Canada) and the other Climate Debtors will not repay their debt nor indeed stop polluting the atmosphere……… The Climate Debtors are stealing from the poor Climate Creditors and should be held to account by the Climate Creditors at the ICJ and the ICC.”

See here to calculate our debt http://sites.google.com/site/climatedebtclimatecredit/net-climate-debt

Filed under: Governance, , , , , , , , ,

April 25, 2012 • 14:07 6

Gillard and Co. killing the freedoms our ANZACs died for

“The nitrogen in our DNA, the calcium in our teeth, the iron in our blood, the carbon in our apple pies were made in the interiors of collapsing stars. We are made of starstuff. – Carl Sagan”

To see the full letter from the government click here; Carbontax

The ALP’s Carbon Tax is a terrible assault on the freedoms and prosperity of our great nation. Not only has it been brought in by an illegitimate minority government who lyingly promised prior to the election that it wouldnt bring it in, but the way it is being implemented is;

1. against the constitution (illegal for Feds to tax State owned assets such as power companies),

2. is being set up so the Gillard Government has no accountability for it and full immunity from it’s repurcussions, and

3. has been written so it will be as hard and as expensive as possible for the Australian people to repeal, even with a referendum on the issue.

In summary the ALP have lied to you, refuse any accountability for their actions and are making sure its punitive consequences are as far reaching as possible whilst denying the people as many rights as possible to remove what they didn’t approve of in the first place. Worse still the claimed reason for the carbon tax – to lower global temperatures – will not be achieved. Government’s own modelling has shown the carbon tax will not reduce global temperatures. Furthermore contrary to what the ALP has claimed the rest of the world is not following this carbon tax folly but backing off as the globe cools.

Worse yet there has been no due diligence by the ALP government in checking the data for the whole global warming alarmism with actual temperature records invalidating the whole global warming theory and ongoing scientific developments showing rationally, as common sense says, that it is the sun drives the climate not CO2. Furthermore the IPCC who the government deflects to has shown to be a biased, corrupt rabble of vested interests who cannot be relied upon for truth about the climate.

It is not just the deceit of the carbon tax that is appalling, but the way in which it has been implemented, rushed through without due process and with no duty of care to the people.

Due process is the idea that laws and legal proceedings must be fair. The Constitution should guarantees that the government cannot take away the people’s basic rights to ‘life, liberty or property. Yet in every way the carbon tax has flouted the basic rights of the Australian people to life – by artificially inflating the cost of keeping warm so many can no longer afford life saving heat; to liberty – by failing to give Australian citizens a fair and reasonable say whether they want this tax or not and to property by squandering billions of dollars of citizens taxes on an unsubstantiated global warming theory that is now at odds with science and fact.

Duty of care is a legal obligation to avoid causing harm or injury to others. Yet with the carbon tax the ALP government will impoverish the nation unfairly all because it rammed through without consent a fraudulent tax based on a fraudulent lie which will punitively injure the public.

To have a look at just one part of the whole corrupt process – all the Australian people were given by the Gillard Government was 7 days to comment on 18 bills and 11,000 pages of documentation. Not enough time for a citizen to read let alone formulate a judgement and then articulate a reply. As such I made a complaint to the Human Rights Commission against the government. My human rights, in accordance with Article 25(a) of the ICCPR (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights) like all Australians had been denied by the rushed process of implementing the carbon tax.  True to form was the appalling response from the ALP government (from Joanne Towner, Clerk Assistant, Department of the house of representatives) is in part as follows;

‘On the broader issue of jurisdiction regarding this complaint, I draw your attention to S.50 of the Constitution which provides that each house of parliament may make rules regarding the conduct of it’s business and proceedings. All of the above procedures were in accord with the Standing Orders of both Houses and the joint resolution establishing the committee which gave the committee the authority to determine it’s own processes within the standing orders.

There is a long standing immunity asserted by both Houses from the impeachment and questioning of parliamentary proceedings in Parliament by the courts or tribunals …

It is our contention that the activity of the committee were in accord with the procedures of the two Houses and that the committee had the full authority to determine the processes and procedures it considered were appropriate to the circumstances it faced. These processes and procedures are not subject to external review.

In other words Gillard’s minority government has this message to we, the people of Australia – piss off, we will do what we want and we wont be accountable to the people for our actions.

About sums up this corrupt government doesn’t it. So much for it’s sacred duty to represent the people. We are no longer governed but illegally ruled! The legal obligation of the government to the people have been ignored and the standards of Government decision making have failed. We now have those in power who are causing worse damage to this country than any foreign army ever has! Under the ALP we no longer live in freedom but oppression! 

Constitutional problems for the carbon tax ;

Filed under: Governance, , , , , , , ,

March 23, 2012 • 22:51 4

Sun shifts and regime changes

Whichever way you look at it this month has been a period of unusual events for the sun and consequently the earth.

Firstly we had the gigantic triangular coronal hole on the sun- quite remarkable when you consider the sun is a million times the size of the earth.

Then we get the huge dark disc looking like it is refueling from the sun though the government assures us it is just an optical illusion.

Next are the cracks in the earth’s magnetic field – Government says don’t worry they were to be expected, just enjoy because now we have aurora borealis even though it is solar minimum (but they wont tell you that).

Solar cycle 24 keeps going on it’s anemic way, Livingston & Penns theory of diminishing sunspots keeps getting validation, Svensmarks theory of global cooling get’s more proof, Solar Cycle 25 is likely to almost flatline, and the low level clouds that are slowly blanketing the earth from the poles continue to grow.

Meanwhile the media and the government will tell you global warming is causing the deepening deadly cold, even though a few years ago the climate communists told us snow would soon be a thing of the past. That was a dud prediction as record snowfalls blanket the earth.

And just in case you thought it was all bad, the sun has more and more sun rainbows, but shhh just because its caused by more ice crystals as we see cooling of the upper atmosphere doesnt mean you should worry. Neither should the contracting atmosphere as it cools. Nor is shortened atmospheric height a worry, the government have quietly eliminated it from the temperature record.

Go on your happy way, let the governments dumb you down by TV and fluoride, tax you into climate communism, and trust them that with the impending extended solar minimum historically known correlating disasters (deadly cold, crop failures, increased earthquakes, volcanoes etc) wont happen. Ignorance is bliss! well at least till it is too late.

Unusual geomagnetic activity on the sun ; New cloud type discovered ; Clouds coming closer to earth

Filed under: Governance, , , , , , , , , ,

March 17, 2012 • 10:32 2

Obliterating the past with the help of a compliant press

It seems everywhere you look with the left these days corruption and fraud are their actions.

With Obama’s past the Washington Times reports;

“He is the least-vetted president in modern memory. During the 2008 campaign, the liberal media deliberately propped up Mr. Obama. They suppressed vital information about his radical past and deep ties to virulent revolutionary leftists — the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn, Derrick Bell, Saul Alinsky and Edward Said. For all of their differences, they share one value in common: hatred for traditional America.

To this day, Mr. Obama’s college transcripts, undergraduate thesis and health records remain sealed. We know little about his years in Indonesia as a young boy; his overseas trips to countries like Pakistan in the 1980s; his relationship with his mother and Muslim stepfather; and his time spent as a “community organizer” in Chicago. In short, the president’s past is clouded in mystery. This is not conspiracy-mongering, but objective fact. Americans have a right to know who their commander-in-chief really is. Instead, the media wants to bury any debate or inquiry into Mr. Obama’s background”.

Similiarly with Gillard’s past Kangaroo court of Australia reports;

Prime Minister Julia Gillard over the last few days has gone on a full frontal attack on the Australian Media which undermines free speech in this country. Her motive is to cover-up her own corrupt past. Julie Gillard has personally phoned executives and editors at News Ltd and highly likely Fairfax Media to stop reporting on her past of helping her former boyfriend Bruce Wilson rip off the AWU of over $1,000,000. It makes one wonder if she has also phoned other media as well in her cover-up attempt.

FLI also reports on Gillard;

“Gillard was involved in the far-left Socialist Forum from 1984-1987 (hardly a ‘minor blip’ during her formative political action training years). It is interesting that the Communist Party in Victoria adopted incremental Fabianism over revolutionary goals in 1984, with future PM Julia Gillard at the vanguard of the CPA splinter group Socialist Forum“.

So we have 2 national leaders who are communists but claiming they are not, both potentially ineligible for office because of birth, both potentially ineligible for office because of suspected criminal activities, both potentially ineligible for office because of deceiving the public about their true intentions and yet the lamestream media rather than doing investigative reporting simply aims to conceal and hide their nefarious pasts. These minions, lemmings and puppets of UN global governance and EU climate communism demonstrate again that total power corrupts and that the people are being ignored.

C3 headlines reports re the left and their pet fraud Global Warming;

“The mainstream media loves Democrat lies, especially if the lies support their beloved climate change hoax agenda. The growing Fakegate climate science scandal is an example of such“.

Ironic isn’t it that the lamestream media who will quite happily rip apart any right wing leader will hide, shroud and cover the utter failings of the left. The mainstream media as part of the left simply treats the people as idiots and mushrooms. No wonder they want a media inquiry to silence the people. We the people need to make a sacred promises to NEVER, EVER BE SILENT. As the saying goes evil men prevail when good men do nothing.

Filed under: Governance

March 7, 2012 • 09:28 4

World’s largest wind turbine

World’s largest wind turbines;

Each wind tower comprises the following;

1,300 cubic metre concrete foundation. Energy required in concrete production = 893 megajoules/tonne – plus transport. 1300 cubic metres = 3,250 tonnes weight (2.5 tonne/cubic metre concrete). Therefore concrete foundation used 893 mj x 3,250 tonnes = 2,902,250 megajoules. When 1 megajoule = 3.6kw hours then 2,902,250/3.6 = 806,180 kwh the turbine would have to run just to replace the energy used in the concrete footing.

180 tonnes of steel, 900 tonne total weight including toxic blades made from rare earth minerals.

120m tall tower (40 story building), blades 61.5m long

And even more madness;

Norway wants to build a 180m (533ft, 60 stories) tall wind turbine to power 2000 homes at a cost of $67.5 million. That’s $33,750/house to build, plus blowout costs, running and maintenance costs, plus dismantling costs at end of life. The utter stupidity of the green religion.

And then there’s plans to build a wind turbine with a 164m diameter rotor – (the above ones have a rotor of around 126m) – utter, utter madness.

Filed under: Technology,

March 1, 2012 • 11:04 3

Will Flannery Flood?

Oh the irony of it all. Chief Climate Alarmist and Chief Climate Commissioner Tim Flannery whilst pontificating about permanent droughts and 8 story sea level rises bought a waterfront property on the Hawkesbury River. Within a few short years of his dire predictions dam levels in Sydney are not only almost maximum but ready to overflow and sea levels are dropping. With Flannery downstream from flood waters of Warragamba Dam the question is WILL FLANNERY FLOOD?.

A history of Hawkesbury River floods is here. Windsor Bridge is at a flood height of just under 7m. Keep in mind Warragamba Dam is a water supply dam and not a flood mitigation dam so when excess water comes it goes straight over the spillway. Warragamba is 92.1% full this morning with 7% daily inflows of around 140,700 megalitres of water. It is expected by this time tomorrow that Windsor Bridge will be flooded as rainfalls topping 300mm continue to hit the Warragamba catchment area. However Flannery who lives on the waterfront at Coba Point, may be too far downstream to have any significant impact on his dwelling 4-5 metres from the water. Coba Point has a 20-40 Foreshore Building line. Coba Point in on Berowra Creek – which Hornsby Council has an estuary management plan. The Australian Flood Study database links to lots of flood studies – has Flannery checked these?

Yep Flannery whilst he presides over an unscientific, factually incorrect sea level rise policy, sea levels are actually falling and ironically (yet again) the Flannery floods may be mitigated ever so slightly by falling sea levels.

Will Flannery save his home? dunno, advice is Flannery is in Germany atm doing a Christine Nixon. While the State has 75% of floods our chief climate commissioner is no where to be found. Rather than helping protect the state he’s protecting his own ass by hiding from the deluge from the media. Maybe whilst Flannery is in hiding Gillard could save his home since she is so hopeless at saving her government.

As the hashtag on twitter goes #sackflannerynow and #willflanneryflood?

Flood risks on the Hawkesbury Nepean ; Common sense abandoned by global warming lie ; Inevitability of a serious flood ; What flooding risk will people accept?

Interestingly whilst politically the global warming charade (permanent drought lie) has been implemented in State Government policy, flood mitigation work has been undertaken downstream of Warragamba Dam. Coincidence that this was subsequent to Flannery buying his home? Is there something Flannery isn’t telling us?

Filed under: Governance

February 29, 2012 • 12:08 0

The climate has shifted but global warming politicians still caught in the past

The climate has shifted. The warm dry PDO (pacific decadel oscillation) of strong and frequent El Ninos has given way to the cold wet PDO with stronger and more frequent La Ninas. On top of this the sun is in a low sunspot cycle adding a further cold and wet influence.

Lake Eyre filled for a record 4 years in a row

Sydney dam levels move to flood status (straight after the Labor gov built a ridiculously expensive desal plant).

2011 wettest year for Australia since the 1940s

Sea levels falling

And what does our climate communist, UN puppet ALP government do? Still push the global warming fraud. As James Delingpole says – Watermelons – green on the outside, red on the in.  Whilst Canada withdraws from Kyoto, Japan and the US back off carbon trading, the EU has a carbon price a quarter of Gillard’s the Fabian socialist heading the ALP charges full steam ahead when she guaranteed before last election there would be no carbon tax under a government she led. ALP liars and frauds! Election now!

Filed under: Governance

February 25, 2012 • 11:56 0

The ALP disaster – reaping what it has sown

The ALP has no one to blame for the destruction of their party but themselves. A bunch of no-hope misfits who are liars, frauds, spin doctors and egotists who pat themselves on the back at every opportunity but blame everyone else for their own shortcomings. The appalling groupthink inside this ALP bleeding hearts club of eco elitists who refused transparency, refused honesty, refused to listen to the people and then bribed their way into minority government power handing control of significant policy to extremist views like the greens has just been unbelievable, so much so that even diehard ALP voters utterly, utterly despise them.

And yet still we have Gillard in power who hasn’t been adequately investigated over the misappropriation of around a million dollars in funds, who threatens the media when they try and investigate, who has championed policies that continue to result in the deaths of many (insulation debacle, boat people deaths, fuel poverty from global warming fraud), who has literally squandered tens of billions of dollars on useless, wasteful decisions whilst raising her and her gang of thieves salaries and has ended up with a government that trashed Australian’s whilst rewarding those who would work against our good. Watching the snide, sneering Gillard, week after week as she refuses to answer questions, refuses to be accountable to the people, lies her way almost every time she opens her mouth is it any wonder that people despise her.

Then there is Krudd, the egotist with the sense of entitlement who wants ‘his’ job back, who wants a seat for himself on the UN global governance regardless of the monetary cost that Australian’s pay, whose wife benefits hugely from government contracts. Rudd couldn’t give a damn about anyone but himself, it is about his empire building, his ego and his profits. Who has his multimillion dollar house overlooking the ocean whilst he joins the charade of fraudulent global warmists claiming the ocean is rising when it is doing anything but.

Then there hiding in the wings is Shorten whose mother Queen Quentin is the Governor General – who wouldn’t give a rat’s …. about the country instead preferring to swan around in luxury, drunk on her title and ignoring the needs of this great country. While she lavishes in her self adoration her son orchestrates in ripping the ALP apart, only again because of his desperation for power and leadership.

Every where you look with the ALP there is the stench of spin, lies, fraud and corruption. Incompetent lying Swan, Gay Wong who wont support same sex marriage, activist Garret who now does what he used to criticise others of etc are no better. Unbelievably when a single credible honest elected member of the ALP over the last 4 years could have put an end to this mess, not one of the gutless, cowardly, self seeking morons that are in government had the integrity to do it. And so they will reap what they so and hopefully none of them will ever be electable again!

Filed under: Governance

February 18, 2012 • 20:21 0

Cold green genocide

Genocide is defined as “the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious, or national group. The UN and it’s cohorts has declared war on humanity. The eco elite want the world for themselves;

End of the american dream reports;

For example, the first of the “new 10 commandments” on the infamous Georgia Guidestones states the following….

“Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.”

CNN Founder Ted Turner would go even farther….

“A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”

Dave Foreman, the co-founder of Earth First, says that reducing our population down to 100 million is one of his three main goals….

“My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness, with it’s full complement of species, returning throughout the world.”

Sadly, this kind of garbage is even being taught at major U.S. universities.  For example, Professor of Biology at the University of Texas at Austin Eric R. Pianka once wrote the following….

I do not bear any ill will toward people. However, I am convinced that the world, including all humanity, WOULD clearly be much better off without so many of us.

Mikhail Gorbachev thinks that reducing the global population by 90 percent would be just about right….

“We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage.”

Already most of the UN’s actions are geared towards depopulation. For example;

Codex alimentarius – making nutritious food illegal whilst pushing GM food on the masses. On top of that is sterilising agents in the water – such as fluoride.

Vaccinations – as a form of birth control – Bill Gates

Viruses – many of the new viruses come from laboratories – bird flue virus, swine flu virus, AIDs virus made in s laboratory. other viruses.

Agenda 21 – The green agenda reports;

“Agenda 21 was the main outcome of the United Nation’s Earth Summit held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. Agenda 21 outlines, in detail, the UN’s vision for a centrally managed global society. This contract binds governments around the world to the United Nation’s plan for controlling the way we live, eat, learn, move and communicate – all under the noble banner of saving the earth. If fully implemented, Agenda 21 would have the government involved in every aspect of life of every human on earth“.

And dont forget many nations are now disarmed with guns mostly illegal and people pushed into prison cities. But the piece de resistance is the UN realising that instead of telling the world the truth about the coming ice age – as it started to do in the mid 70s, was instead to get the governments of the world to prepare for the opposite – the fictitious global warming. In that way the world would be the least prepared for what has almost wiped out humanity many times before – the cold. So whilst you see people starting to die en masse from the cold whilst the UN and it’s puppet governments raise the cost of heating, restrict the use of fossil fuels and attack levels of nutrition realise that we wage war not with eachother but the green socialists who have taken control through lies and disinformation, and who now answer not to the people but their unelected, unaccountable overlords at the global governance UN.

NWO plans to depopulate the earth ; Illuminati plans to depopulate the earth ; Vaccine expert confirms depopulation agenda ; Agenda 21 simplified ;

“If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels” – Prince Phillip, Duke of Edninburgh


Filed under: Governance, , , ,

February 16, 2012 • 13:16 0

Another green debacle in the making by the unnacountable

Recent email correspondence. My apologies for the lack of posts but have had personal issues to attend to. Have been tweeting a bit – twawki on twitter

Mr Doug McIntyre

twawki1@gmail.com

Dear Mr McIntyre

I am writing to you about the impending release by the Murray-Darling Basin Authority (the Authority) of the draft Murray-Darling Basin Plan.

Given your past interest in the Guide to the Murray-Darling Basin Plan, I am writing to advise you that the Authority is intending to release the draft Basin Plan for public comment on Monday, 28 November 2011.

The Authority has decided to undertake public consultation on the draft Basin Plan over an extended 20 week period. Any interested person or organisation is able to provide written feedback to the Authority during this consultation period. The Authority will consider all submissions received and, prior to submitting a final plan to the Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, the Hon Tony Burke MP, will prepare and publish a document that summarises how public submissions received were taken into account.

I encourage you to participate in the consultation process and to use this important opportunity to provide feedback directly to the Authority. The draft Basin Plan will be available on the Authority’s website at: www.mdba.gov.au. Further information about how you can contribute can be found at that website, including instructions for electronic submissions.

Yours sincerely

David Parker

Deputy Secretary

22 November 2011

My response as follows;

David

I wish to applaud you on giving the public adequate time to comment and respond to the Murray Darling Basin Plan. The question needs to be asked why the same amount of adequate time was not given to the Australian people to comment on the Carbon tax? Instead we were given a grossly insufficient and paltry 8 days – not even enough time to read the 11,000 pages, let alone formulate an opinion and educated response. I guess that’s why there are complaints against the government for that with the Human Rights Commission.

As we are all witnessing the world is now cooling – and not warming. The government’s insistence on the unproven AGW theory that is now at odds with climate reality is shaping up to become a hotbed for liability and recrimination for those who push it particularly as the underlying data for AGW is now shown to be mostly fraudulent. It would seem the climate reality that we are facing (cold PDO, more prevalent and stronger La Ninas, low sunspot activity) – at least for the next 2-3 decades – if not longer – is that of a cold and wet climate. Climate history would also support this view.

Within this cold wet future the Murray Darling Basin Plan shapes up simply as a joke. Why are we trying to force restricted water allocations on farmers when the main issue in the next two decades is going to be flooding. Wouldn’t it be sensible to let farmers take what is surplus whilst we are in surplus and that can help mitigate flooding – or is that too sensible?

I also think the views of Dr Marohasy need to be taken into account and that is Murray Darling is a barrier estuary. Any ‘solution’ that ignores this is not a solution at all, even politically expedient solutions.

Like many Australians I also object to the overarching influence of minority green groups who show they are more interested in activism and socialism than real concerns for the environment, whilst the bulk of the people are ignored. It is a travesty that the government is sidelining the majority voices of all the rural communities along the river whilst empowering the green lunatic fringe and that for non solutions. I like many others am also greatly concerned that most of our government policy for the environment no longer democratically comes form the Australian people but the UN. You as elected representatives are accountable to us – not a global governance body that we have no say in.

Wivenhoe Dam is a recent and very pertinent example and warning of government’s relying on the fraud of AGW and consequently causing billions of dollars damage and putting many innocent lives at risk. Unless the Murray Darling Basin Plan is changed to reflect a cold wet climate reality for a barrier estuary then realistically we can only expect the similiar damage and destruction. This is an utter failure of governance and an act of bastardisation on the community.

Regards

Doug McIntyre

 

Filed under: Governance, , ,

January 8, 2012 • 19:12 0

Chasing the sun

I admit I’m a reader, I love to research but when I have time I also like to sit down and read a good book. Over christmas I managed to get hold of a few good books and take time out to read. The first was Chasing the Sun by Richard Cohen. If you wanted a book that looks at the sun from every angle – scientific, religious, political, historical, social etc this is it.

There is so much information in this book and the author travels the world to find out more, interweaving his research with personal experience. Easy to read but full of many insights and thoughts.

If you are interested you can find out more about it and purchase it here.

 

Filed under: Governance

December 29, 2011 • 12:30 3

Self righteous do gooders doing much more harm than good

Was away with friends over christmas and got them interested in some of my books so took the opportunity to read one of theirs – Nomad by Ayaan Hirsi Ali. As an ex muslim from Africa she speaks with authority on the problems facing muslim people and has many worthwhile tings to say, Ayaan Hirsi Ali says in her book Nomad that

“what comes packaged in a compassionate language of acceptance is really a cruel form of racism, And it is all the more cruel because it is expressed in the sugary words of virtue“

As an ex muslim, she is speaking about how many in political circles in the west (typically of the left) seek to pander to Islams outdated brutal and indoctrinating faith, protecting it and enforcing it for those who come here practicing it. She says rather than encouraging new arrivals to assimilate, see that there is a better way to relate to one another, educated those who arrive with an enlightened view of the world – instead these do gooders actually reinforce the bad of Islam rather than the good of the West. The ultimate result is that Muslims who migrate to the west don’t assimilate, develop a victim and welfare mentality and seek to impose their rules on us. All round harmful and a disastrous outcome.

In a similiar way those do gooders who encourage boat people to come here by ocean only encourage many to die. The false compassion belies a failure to appreciate that encouraging people to take a perilous journey is not only madness but criminal. When hundreds have already perished at sea we should reinstate no entry regulations and stop this appalling and mad false compassion.

 

Filed under: Governance

December 26, 2011 • 22:17 3

2012 – what is forecast

In preparing for 2012 it is always fascinating to see what may lay ahead. Best place to start is the sun. All life on earth depends on it and when it changes so do we and everything around us. As it continues it’s low solar cycle 24 and ramps up to its peak we will see the cold deepening and the wet increasing. Food then will become more expensive as growing seasons shorten and crops reduce.

With finance we are seeing more empowerment of the individuals – Startup Square is already breaking records in how much money it processes via its iOS/Android dongle. Then there is peer to peer banking and borrowing – a great way to take banks out of the equation. When we look at their control this could be an excellent idea. Otherwise trends are as follows;

Top tech trends for 2012 ; Fashion trends for 2012 ; Environmental trends ; Behavioural trends ; Celente top trends 2012 ; Journalism 2.0 ;Astrological trends

In 2012 and beyond only vote for those who will empower you and not enslave you. Beware of the climate criminals who see humanity as a disease or plague upon the earth because you know whatever policies they make are going to be for their benefit and not yours.

As a key to a good future remember survival belongs to those who can adapt. De-clutter, get rid of anything that is slowing you down or holding you back – such excess possessions, negative relationships, get rid of debt, become free!

Trend hunter

Filed under: Governance, , , , , , , ,

December 23, 2011 • 22:23 1

Looking ahead to 2012

Wishing you all freedom, liberty, empowerment, love and prosperity for 2012

.

May there always be someone who loves you

May there always be work for you hands

May you always be dealt with with kindness

As you travel throughout these lands

.

May there always be food on your table

And always be a friend you can hold

May your body always be able

And your spirit always be bold

.

May the road rise up to meet you

May there always be a wind at your back

May the journey never be lonely

And we pray that youll keep coming back

.

Irish blessing

 

Filed under: Governance

December 22, 2011 • 09:09 0

The corruption of science and the need for more openess

“The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded…we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.” Eisenhower

How true this has become. Science was hailed as the objectivity of modern civilisation and has instead crumbled into pay per view for vested interests. All it seems most science today really represents is an example of follow the money trail to find what the preferred results are wanted to be. No where is this more evident than in the global warming scam, but the pharmaceutical industry is just as back if not worse, and there are other criminally negligent industries as well. Activist cash identifies how much of science is now little more than activism.

Governments at one time who had scientific departments at arms length from the government are now simply science for politics – that’s how you get your funding.

It is time we returned to the scientific method. It is time governments and science was open and transparent, and science paid for by the public purse was made freely and openly available to the public.

A couple of years ago I wrote to many of our Universities here in Sydney on this issue. Response – none!

Being put in jail for borrowing too many books from the library ; Paid for by the public purse should be accessible freely to the public ; Scholarly publishing report ; Where does the money go? ; An $8 billion a year industry! ; Another NGO where salaries are exorbitant ; Making scientific literature freely available as a public resource ; Public access for published results ; Open access to university science ;

Open Access is defined as free, unrestricted and immediate online access to published scholarly material, primarily peer-reviewed research articles in academic journals

Equinox & solstice calculator

Filed under: Governance

December 21, 2011 • 10:02 4

The culture of lying environmentalism

It seems anything is fair game with environmentalism and the end justifies the means. In the article Lies damned lies and Enviro Fraud anything, and I mean anything is manipulated for the global warming liars – it get’s to the point where you wonder if there is ANY truth in what they do. It has become such an insidious culture . But then there’s a history, culture and belief system there.

From Climategate 2;

‘The trick may be to decide on the main message and use that to guide what’s included and what is left out.’ Overpeck

Then there’s the BOM, repeatedly caught out adjusting the data, falsifying the message and this week;

“The hottest months by mean max have all been changed. Every single one“.

But then in the Global Warming theology departments this is common practice. Eg the CSIRO;

Can the CSIRO explain how is it that an applied science research institution that is supposed to be serving Australians through independence and integrity in science suddenly be politically active in the Rudd Cabinet’s Socialist fraud and participate in making Australians obey it, and use Lysenkoism to break down opposition and to convince Australians it is good for them?

Noteworthy that most of CSIRO directors tend to be … BANKERS!

And what does one of the leading scientists in the world say about global warming?

“I think it is such ablatant falsification”.

Sums it up really, doesnt it.

But when you look at the history of the IPCC could you really expect any different!

“it is long overdue that the IPCC was called for what it is, an activist eco-political body driven not by the dangerous manmade warming evidence that it pretends exists, but by the beliefs and philosophies of its sponsor, the UNEP, and by key individuals at the time the IPCC was established“.

And even more damaging exposure of the IPCC;

“Climategate 2.0 is helping filling some knowledge gaps, for example in the way the IPCC has been slowing killing itself, and several thousands humans to“.

As is now being rumored the IPCC is going to get the boot;

Could it be that the UNFCCC has decided that its dependency on the “science” produced by this, well, Delinquent Teenager who was Mistaken for the World’s Top Climate Expert is no longer appropriate – or required?!

Perhaps the UNFCCC is in the process of throwing the IPCC under the proverbial bus – in the hopes of saving its own skin? And don’t forget that the IPCC’s younger sibling, the IPBES, is still waiting in the wings.

Who is the IPBES?

“IPBES stands for “intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services”. IPBES will be an interface between the scientific community and policymakers that aims at building capacity for and strengthen the use of science in policymaking“.

The IPBES to replace the IPCC. Same game of musical chairs by the UN – just different players. No backing down on the fraud, scares, or thieving of billions under false pretense. And the UN thinks it is safe because it has deemed itself to be above the law. The Earth Government that is going to replace the UN probably elevate itself in the same manner.

Who will be stuck with the global warming time bomb when the people make the police come?

Filed under: Governance, , , , , , , , , , ,

December 20, 2011 • 18:00 0

Earth Government disarming the populace

From the Earth Government website (red highlight mine);

“An Earth Justice Agency will utilise the current infrastructure of the International Courts, but with far greater powers. It will provide a clear Earth Government Criminal Justice strategy and police the disarming of civilian populations. This will include the establishment of an Earth Police Force, which for the first time ever will witness a truly joined up law enforcement agency“.

Doesn’t it make you want to jump for joy that self elected, self appointed messiahs are going to tell the people of the world how to run their lives and they will have an organised and armed global army to keep you all in line whilst you will not be allowed any weapons yourself. That system couldn’t be abused – surely! I am reminded of the following salient quotes;

‘Disarm the people- that is the best and most effectiveway to enslave them” James Madison

“The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.” — Thomas Jefferson

“Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense?” — Patrick Henry

“25 States allow anyone to buy a gun, strap it on, and walk down the street with no permit of any kind: some say it’s crazy. However, 4 out of 5 US murders are committed in the other half of the country: so who is crazy?” — Andrew Ford

There’s a big double standard. Senators and mayors tell me I don’t need a gun from behind walls of armed bodyguards. Protecting my family is not an acceptable reason to own a gun, but protecting the life of some rich guy’s family — because he hires me as a bodyguard — is. I’m told I don’t need a gun by police officers who wear a gun every day even though they have a desk job.

The police of a state should never be stronger or better armed than the citizenry. An armed citizenry, willing to fight, is the foundation of civil freedom.” –”Beyond This Horizon” by Robert Heinlein, 1942

“Expecting a carjacker or rapist or drug pusher to care that his possession or use of a gun is unlawful is like expecting a terrorist to care that his car bomb is taking up two parking spaces.” – Joseph T. Chew, in a talk.politics.guns posting

Only criminals, tyrants and cowards have reason to fear the armed, honest citizen.

Lot’s more thought provoking quotes here

Filed under: Governance

December 20, 2011 • 06:42 1

Earth Government Implementation

Climategate 2 has lots of references to Germain Dufour and the Global issues. The Earth Government sees itself superseding the current global government- the UN as follows (from the Earth Government website);

“Global political reform is therefore proposed in which all countries are represented by an Earth Government.

The United Nations (UN) has worked well over recent decades and its roll in shaping a post war world will be recorded in history as a great success.  However, the UN was only really meant to lay the foundations for much greater political and economic integration.  Current global problems faced by all human kind will never be solved by world institutions in their current form.

The vision is to reduce our political goverance to just a two tiered political system – one at a global level and one at a local level.

The first tier of government would see the current UN infrastructure of 196 countries, the World Bank, the Internation Monetary Fund, the European Union and other World organisations forming the foundation of the new Earth Government, with the existing post of UN Secretary General becoming the Earth President.  This role would become an elected position.  All nations on our planet would be represented equally and accountable to the Earth Government by Ambassadors, with no one country / national government having dominance. 

The second political tier would be based on a strong local structure of local people representing the communities they live in.  Decisions affecting localities will be decided by much greater electoral input and consultation.

So the ‘Earth Government’ with all it’s self appointed ‘messiahs’ decides all of this unanimously, without input from 99.9999% of the world’s population and then laughably goes on to say;

What we must remember is that a government must be frightened of its people, and not its people frightened of its government!”

A bit more digging n we find Gillards new carbon tax system under isnt that different to the earth government’s tax system;

“A global Economic Policy will be put in place. There will be a Single Tax System, with no tax paid on income upto £15,000 UK pounds, and then a graded system at specific intervals. There will be 10% tax on £20,000, 11% on £21,000 12% on £22,000, 13% on £23,000, 14% on £24,000, 15% on £25,000 and so on“.

Oh it get’s better, everything in your life and future is thought of;

“There will be a standard interest rate of between 2%-5% for saving and between 5%-8% for borrowing”.

“There will be a single global currency, measured in Earth Credits“.

When there is only one government then there is only one enemy – the people!

“An Earth Defence Force will replace all military resources of all national governments into one centralised command structure, under the control of a reformed Security Council.  There is no justification in one national government being stronger than any other.  Armed conflicts between national governments must never take place again.  All nuclear weapons are to become the responsibility of the Earth Government”

Filed under: Governance, , ,

Work from home

Join 17 other followers

TWAWKI Twitter

RSS TWAWKI RSS

  • The Government’s ongoing violation of citizens rights
    The most sacred duty of governments is to represent the will of the people. Our governments are meant to listen to us, represent us and bring to completion what we give them taxes to complete. What happens when we have governments who do none of the above, who desperately cling to power for powers sake, [...]
  • Windfarms increase temps 10 x fold
    So let’s get this right – windfarms are put in to help reduce global temps by reducing our need for coal fired power stations. Yet the theory doesnt match the reality – just as many coal fired power stations are required to ensure we have power when the wind isnt blowing. So wind farm fail [...]
  • Destroying the ANZAC liberties
    Guest post by Graham Williamson. You can read more of Graham’s research here As we celebrate the hard won freedoms we enjoy on Anzac day, please pay attention to moves outlined below to remove those freedoms under the guise of concern for climate change. Though hard to believe, Australian lawyers and politicians are currently, as [...]

Story archives

Categories

Kindle Store