T W A W K I

The world as we know it

Giving the earth and humanity the benefit of the doubt

ETS dead, Update on Australian politics. Abbott – Rudds worst nightmare, ETS a slush fund with bureaucrats handing out billions of dollars to sectional interests, ETS bipartisanship destroyed, Rudd unbankable, Barnaby Joyce speech,

In recent days “giving the earth the benefit of the doubt”  has been the mantra in a certain Liberal sector of Australian politics. Not only has my local parliamentarian (Scott Morrison) repeatedly reiterated this in his recent speeches, but Joe Hockey, Ian McFarlane, Malcolm Turnbull and the other warmist faithful have all uttered this phrase as though somehow it gives them a mandate for their behavior and stance on climate change.

So what does giving the earth the benefit of the doubt mean? What I understand they are saying is we really aren’t that sure about global warming so its better to err on the side of caution. In other words they are following what is recently called the precautionary principle. The precautionary principle in terms of the environment was defined at the Rio Declaration (1992) and says “Where there are threats of serious or irreversible environmental damage, lack of full scientific certainty should not be used as a reason for postponing measures to prevent environmental degradation.” It is now enshrined in law in Australia.

There are however key words here – 1. threats of damage (in terms of the environment), 2. full scientific certainty and 3.measures to prevent environmental degradation. Lets look at them each;

1. Threats of damage. When the environment is an evolutionary system that is based on adaption and survival of the fittest them how do you define damage? In terms of toxins/poisons its easy to do but in terms of temperature change then life has always adapted to it and either survived or perished depending depending on the ability to relocate. There is also the argument that if you help a species, make it easier then, like man you make them weaker. We are much less physiologically able to adapt than we have ever been because the comforts of our technologies have meant many of our evolutionary traits for survival are not being used. A variation in temperature could cause a change in habitats for many species. For some it will be a reduction of habitat and others an increase in habitat. Historically speaking there is no evidence that any warm period wiped out the earth or life on it. Rather the warm periods of the earth are when life has flourished on earth, vegetation has proliferated and habitats have increased. Whilst much has been made in global warming alarmism about cuddly polar bears becoming extinct (in fact polar bear numbers have increased fivefold), there has been little mention of all the species that would extend and increase their habits further poleward as the earth warmed and thus proliferate. Man likewise has been called a child of the tropics, look at how all our houses are heated to tropical temperatures and again history shows us during the warm periods civilizations flourish as does food supply.

However when we look at the cold this is quite a different story. The cold decimates nearly all life on earth as habitats are restricted, growing seasons reduce, vegetation is covered in snow and civilisations perish – history has given us ample examples of this. If we simply look at a microcosm of nature we see that animals living in cold areas often have to hibernate, their bodies adapted to the lack of food for a large part of the year. This is what the cold is all about.

2. Full scientific certainty. In terms of the climate there has been considerable debate going on for years about what the climate is actually doing and we have an establishment of scientists, media and politicians who are now advocates of the warming view. The theory that man is causing the climate to warm has been pushed but as yet never proven. Whilst much attention has been focused on mans emissions of CO2 the salient point is that  CO2 is a trace gas that historically follows temperatures and not precedes them. Increased CO2 also increases plant production and not reduces it. Scientists who have disputed the man made warming claims have been derided by this new establishment, stonewalled and discriminated against. Yet actual temperature records as has recently been exposed by climategate have been shown to have been doctored to make it look like there is a warming when none has really existed. The reality is the world is not warming but cooling.

This would fit in with established science that precedes the warming claims. Natural cycles of the environment support a cooling world. For example around the turn of the century (2000) the earth entered a cooling PDO which lasts 20-30 years which is a cooling signal where we will see prevalent La Ninas (cold wet) instead of El Ninos. We are also historically overdue for an ice age. Additionally the sun is inactive, solar cycle 24 has gone into hibernation with few if any sunspots for extended periods. Low sunspot activity historically correlates with a cooling world – for example the little ice age in the middle ages. Whilst the mechanisms for this are still being understood the correlation is there nontheless.

3. Measures to prevent environmental degradation. So if we consider the above that 1. threats of damage to both man and the environment are more serious during cold periods, 2. That scientific evidence supports future cooling rather than warming then the conclusion we must reach is that we should be taking measures to prevent environmental degradation from the cold and not the warmth.

Under the precautionary principle then, legally we have an obligation to ensure humanity and the environment is prevented from damage from the cold. The reality is our governments aren’t doing anything about this. As we are experiencing record cold around the world with it likely to deepen year by year the precautionary principle in terms of the earth and humanity is being ignored.  I have written to the Department of Climate Change in Australia over six months ago asking what measures are they taking to prepare the populace and the environment for the deepening cold – to date I have not received a response. I doubt also whether you would find any policy on it also. I wonder as we had a cold winter in the southern hemisphere and the northern hemisphere faces a brutal one, how many of the homeless and poor are unnecessarily dying from the cold. And all because of Government’s and green groups gravy train that ignores their plight focusing instead on their rabid push of global warming alarmism.

To answer the question how can we in this current time give the earth the benefit of the doubt we find the answer is to not to prepare for warming – but to prepare for the cold. Humanity (we are part of the environment) and the earth will face serious challenges as the world cools – most notably countries like Canada – which once was under a 2km thick ice sheet and Russia/Northern Europe which have historically seen large areas of habitation previously buried under snow and civilisations wiped out from the cold. The longer we prepare for a warming world whilst the world cools, the less prepared we will be and the more likely we will stand accused of not giving the earth (and humanity) the benefit of the doubt.

Criminal charges against alarmist scientists filed, Alarmist scientist steps down, Alarmist fraud exposed yet again, Climategate continues, being green gives you a licence to lie, making money out of a corrupt premise, copenhagen corruption.

Global warming science fiction not in the Public interest, Disastrous snow in Mexico, Snowing in Texas, Whistler smashes November snowfall record, Antarctica sea ice continues above average, Floods, rain and now snow.

If you would like to email these politicians and talk to them about giving the earth and humanity the benefit of the doubt you can do so here;

Malcolm.Turnbull.MP@aph.gov.au, Ian.Macfarlane.MP@aph.gov.au, J.Hockey.MP@aph.gov.au,

Filed under: Nature, , , , , , ,

10 Responses

  1. [...] rest is here:  Giving the earth the benefit of the doubt « TWAWKI By admin | category: principle variation | tags: climate, climate-change, deepen-year, [...]

  2. Bev Huff says:

    Good article. We in the northern hemisphere have had increasingly “bad” winters, It seems that winter starts later and stays longer.Heavy rain where we once had snow, and snow were it once rained. The planting time for this area used to be May 24th. Now it’s pushed ahead to june 1st. Two + weeks later. But the harvest is the same time late August, early September.Our summer growing season is getting shorter. Farmers are resorting to row covers to ward off the early frost so they can get in the harvest of veg.
    Even cattle ranchers are noticing a difference. Wher at one time calving season was in late March to mid April now calves are dropping in Feburary and dieing on the grounds from freezing and this is not from early breeding, something is happening, and no-one seeme to be looking at the natural cycles to find the answers.

  3. twawki says:

    Wow Bev thats not good. You guys are right in the firing line in terms of cold. What happens if food production drops off ? How is Canada placed for food security?

  4. Tony Hansen says:

    Just saw this on the ABC
    ……Greens Senator Bob Brown slammed the Government for negotiating with the Opposition to try and pass the scheme, a tactic which he described as “disastrous”.

    And he accused the Coalition of being led by climate change sceptics.

    “If we don’t act on climate change our children and grandchildren will pay the penalty,” he said…..

    ?Bob Brown? ?our children and grandchildren?
    Has Bob got kids?

  5. Ayrdale says:

    Great post. The so called “precautionary principle” would have forbidden petrol and electricity. In other words a green ploy to inhibit capitalism. Nothing more.

  6. [...] With all the recent worries about the Earth warming up, it needs to be pointed out that rising temperatures may be bad but falling temperatures would undoubtedly be much worse: [...]

  7. jt says:

    We have survived the “cold” before. Anyone over the age of 50 remembers the 60’s and 70’s winters here in Canada. Those skimpily clad Los Angeles dreaming under 30’s types will die off if they don’t dress for the weather. Lots of snow and well, COLD! We turned the heat up. Ran our cars on 9th Ave in Calagary ALL DAY LONG!

    That’s why we invented the oil sands, an oil spill clean up activity dumped by ‘ole Mother Nature herself in the McMurray Tar Sands. Once we have that done, we’ll export “clean” sand for golf courses. Either that or we pave a lot of highways and get people to drive around on them spewing out climate warming gases! Canada is 62 hours wide east to west from a driving perspective, with stops, 7 days. Hey, mabe some of you from Oz can spend winters here (your summers, ooooh hot nasty!) and help keep the place warm. You’ll be cooler here.

    It gets too cold here, I was thinking of moving to Australia. Cairns would be nice.

  8. twawki says:

    Well the issue will be whether we can afford fuel – both for heating and keeping our cars running. My guestimate is you guys will be migrating to Australia en masse before too long – we got enough space and we do like our Canadian friends :) Cairns is too hot – Sydney has the ideal climate!

  9. [...] rest is here: Giving the earth and humanity the benefit of the doubt « TWAWKI By admin | category: Pv, principle variation | tags: benefit, earth, earth-the-benefit, [...]

  10. [...] going to all the politicians who stood up and said the science wasn’t settled but they were “giving the earth the benefit of the doubt“. All the while the committed trillions of dollars to a non existent solution to a non existent [...]

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

The New Rich

We fight not to enslave, but to set a country free, and to make room upon the earth for honest men to live in. Thomas Paine

Above all, we must realize that no arsenal or no weapon in the arsenals of the world is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women. RONALD REAGAN,
.......
My definition of a free society is a society where it is safe to be unpopular. Adlai E. Stevenson Jr
.......
If you want to be free, there is but one way; it is to guarantee an equally full measure of liberty to all your neighbors. There is no other. Carl Schurz
.......
The First Amendment is often inconvenient. But that is besides the point. Inconvenience does not absolve the government of its obligation to tolerate speech. Justice Anthony Kennedy
.......
Self-reliance is the only road to true freedom, and being one’s own person is its ultimate reward. Patricia Sampson
.......
Many politicians are in the habit of laying it down as a self-evident proposition that no people ought to be free till they are fit to use their freedom. The maxim is worthy of the fool in the old story who resolved not to go into the water till he had learned to swim. Thomas Macaulay
.......
The law will never make men free, it is men that have to make the law free. Henry David Thoreau
.......
If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter. George Washington

%d bloggers like this: